Onboard Doc
A developer onboarding doc generator app idea: a getting-started guide for any repo. Weekend build with Next.js, GitHub API and Claude API, for teams bringing on new developers.
Why now
Understanding a codebase is a hot problem: Graphify has drawn over 100,000 GitHub stars, and small tools like a codebase-onboarding skill (Oct 29) kept appearing. A draft guide from the real config files gives a team something to correct.
- Nov 1Graphify-Labs/graphify (141,017 stars, updated Nov 1) (opens in a new tab)GitHub
- Oct 29Shuashuaa/codebase-onboarding (1 star, created Oct 29) (opens in a new tab)GitHub
- Oct 5 to Nov 117 new GitHub repos mention "codebase onboarding" (opens in a new tab)GitHub
Checked at the source on Nov 2, 2026. Points, comments, and stars are from that day. GitHub counts are keyword matches, so treat them as a rough guide.
The spec
Connect a repository and get a draft getting-started guide: how to install it, how to run it, how the folders fit together, and where to make a first change.
Build time
WeekendAPIs or integrations · Level 3 of 5Audience
Teams bringing on new developers.
Stack
- Next.js
- GitHub API
- Claude API
Fun factor
A new teammate ships on day one instead of day four.
Core features
- Read a public or connected repo
- Setup steps from config files
- A guide to the main folders
- Editable Markdown output
AI features
- Explains how the code is organised
- Suggests a good first task
Stretch goals
- Update the guide on each merge
- Answer questions about the repo
- Pull request with the document
First version
Enter a public repo URL and get an editable setup guide in Markdown.
Build plan
4 milestones, in the order you would build them. Saved ideas get this plan with checkboxes and notes.
The build prompt
Paste this into ChatGPT, Claude, Codex, or Cursor, then build the first version before anything else.
# Build Onboard Doc You are a senior full-stack engineer pairing with me on a side project. Build a working first version of the product described below. Read the whole brief before writing any code, then follow "How to work" at the end. ## The idea **Onboard Doc.** Connect a repository and get a draft getting-started guide: how to install it, how to run it, how the folders fit together, and where to make a first change. **Why now:** Understanding a codebase is a hot problem: Graphify has drawn over 100,000 GitHub stars, and small tools like a codebase-onboarding skill (Oct 29) kept appearing. A draft guide from the real config files gives a team something to correct. **Who it is for:** Teams bringing on new developers **What makes it fun:** A new teammate ships on day one instead of day four. ## Scope - **Build time:** Weekend. Size every decision to ship a working first version inside this window. - **Technical ambition:** Level 3 of 5, "APIs or integrations". The product leans on third-party APIs. Wrap each integration in its own module, handle its failures and rate limits, and cache what is safe to cache. - **First version only.** Ship the core features below end to end. Stretch goals are listed so you can design around them, not build them. ## Core features (each must work end to end in the first version) 1. Read a public or connected repo 2. Setup steps from config files 3. A guide to the main folders 4. Editable Markdown output ## AI features - Explains how the code is organised - Suggests a good first task How to build them: - Put every model call behind one server-side module with a typed interface, so the provider can change without touching the UI. - Read API keys from environment variables only, and document each one in `.env.example`. - Write prompts as versioned constants with clear instructions and an example of the expected output; parse and validate responses before using them. - Handle timeouts, rate limits, and malformed output with a graceful fallback the user can understand. Stream responses where a wait would exceed a couple of seconds. - Never let a feature depend on the model being perfect. Show the result, let the user edit or retry. ## Stretch goals (later, not in the first version) - Update the guide on each merge - Answer questions about the repo - Pull request with the document Leave clean seams for these (a module boundary, a nullable column, a feature flag), but do not implement them unless I ask. ## Tech stack Use exactly: Next.js, GitHub, Claude. Stay on current stable versions, follow each tool's official conventions, and add a library only when the standard library or the chosen stack cannot do the job cleanly. If part of this stack is a poor fit for a specific requirement, say so and propose the smallest change. ## Owner's notes Written by me, the project owner. Treat these as requirements and preferences that override the generated material above when they conflict. The first version should be exactly this, and no bigger: Enter a public repo URL and get an editable setup guide in Markdown. ## Build plan (with saved progress) 0 of 4 steps complete. Resume at step 1: Read the repo. Before you start it, check what is already implemented so you do not repeat finished work. 1. **Read the repo** [not started] Config, scripts, and folder tree. 2. **Setup steps** [not started] Install and run instructions. 3. **Map the code** [not started] What each main folder does. 4. **Export** [not started] Copy the Markdown to your repo. ## Definition of done for the first version - [ ] Read a public or connected repo works end to end, with real data, not a placeholder. - [ ] Setup steps from config files works end to end, with real data, not a placeholder. - [ ] A guide to the main folders works end to end, with real data, not a placeholder. - [ ] Editable Markdown output works end to end, with real data, not a placeholder. - [ ] Every screen handles loading, empty, and error states. - [ ] Typecheck, lint, and any tests pass, and the main user flow was exercised by hand. - [ ] A README explains setup, environment variables, and how to run it locally. ## Quality bar - Responsive from a phone to a desktop, keyboard-accessible, semantic HTML, visible focus states, labelled inputs, and sensible contrast. - Loading, empty, and error states for every screen that reads or writes data. Errors say what happened and what to do next. - Validate on the server, never trust the client, and keep secrets in environment variables with a committed `.env.example`. - Type-safe end to end. No `any` without a comment explaining why. - Small, readable modules named after what they do. No premature abstraction, no dead code, no TODOs left for later without a note. - Sensible defaults over settings. If a choice is not in this brief, pick the simplest option that keeps the product coherent and say what you chose. ## How to work 1. **Read, then restate.** Summarize the product in three sentences and list your assumptions. Ask only the questions that block implementation. For everything else, decide and note the decision. 2. **Plan before code.** List the files and modules you will create, in build order, mapped to the core features. If a build plan is included above, use it instead: resume at the first step not marked done and check what already exists before touching it. 3. **Set up.** If a project already exists, inspect its code, instructions, and conventions first and build on them. Otherwise scaffold the stack above with linting, formatting, a typecheck script, `.env.example`, and a README stub. 4. **Model the data first.** Define the types, schema, and any migrations before the UI, so the shape of the product is settled early. 5. **Build in vertical slices.** Finish one core feature end to end (data, logic, UI) before starting the next. Keep the app runnable after every slice and commit each slice with a message that says what changed and why. 6. **Then the interface.** Apply the quality bar above to each screen as it lands, not as a final pass. 7. **Verify.** Run typecheck, lint, and tests. Exercise the main user flow by hand. Check each item in the definition of done and each acceptance criterion. 8. **Report.** Tell me what works, what you tested and how, what is not done, every setup step I must complete myself, and the three most useful next steps. Never claim a service, test, or flow was verified when it was not. If you can edit and run the project, start implementing right after the short plan. If you cannot, give me concrete code and the exact commands to run for the next step. Rules: keep the product name and the scope as written, do not invent features, prefer boring and proven choices, and stop to ask me when a decision would be expensive to reverse.
How to use
- Copy the prompt above.
- Open ChatGPT, Claude, or your AI editor and paste it into a new conversation.
- Build milestone one, run it, then move to the next. Add stretch goals only after the first version works.
Want ideas built around you instead? Generate four from your own interests, time, and stack.
FAQ
Frequently asked questions
Answers on what Onboard Doc is, how to build it, and where example ideas come from.
Similar to Onboard Doc
More developer tools ideas, then a few from other categories.
Ready to generate yours?
Four ideas per round, shaped by your interests, skill level, and how much time you have.